Political dynamics in the Middle East after general elections are often influenced by various internal and external factors. This phenomenon is evident in several countries, including Iran, Iraq, and Turkey, where elections are not just a democratic process, but also reflect more complex social, economic, and ideological forces. In Iran, recent elections brought about significant changes in the configuration of power. Conservative parties supported by religious leaders managed to win many seats in the Assembly. This indicates increasing public dissatisfaction with reformist policies which are considered to have failed to meet expectations. Post-election, issues such as economic control and foreign relations, especially with the US, became key topics. Iran now tends to put forward a more aggressive approach in foreign policy, including the majority of its support for proxy groups in various countries. Meanwhile, in Iraq, elections are generating new tensions between ethnic and sectarian groups. The election results showed strong Shiite control reinforced by the militia. However, the presence of new forces from Sunnis and Kurds adds a layer of complexity to the government coalition. Since the election, the issue of national integration and reconciliation among various ethnic groups has become more pressing, with pressure from the masses seeking structural reform creating challenges to political stability. In Türkiye, elections resulted in a victory for the incumbent president, which strengthened his control of power. With this success, the government has strengthened the narrative of nationalism and a more active foreign policy in the region. However, post-election, Türkiye faces economic challenges, including high inflation, which could undermine political legitimacy. Public dissatisfaction with economic conditions can trigger protests that impact government stability. Continuing to the wider region, political dynamics in the Middle East after the general election are also influenced by global geopolitical changes. Tensions between the US and countries such as Saudi Arabia and Russia create space for smaller countries to strengthen their position in regional negotiations. Meanwhile, Iran’s increasingly strong influence in shaping the foreign policies of several countries in the region has had a significant impact, creating various alliances that challenge the status quo. In a social context, social media is developing as an important tool for people to voice their aspirations. Waves of protests and social movements often emerge in various countries, showing that political choices in elections do not always reflect people’s hopes. This creates an urgent need for leaders to listen to and respond to the aspirations of the people in order to maintain their legitimacy. With changing dynamics, debates regarding political liberalization and human rights increasingly dominate discussions in the context of general elections. Many citizens are now demanding transparency and accountability from elected political figures. Politicians in the Middle East must adapt quickly to these needs, otherwise they risk facing major challenges from an increasingly vocal civil society. Finally, legal challenges and limitations on civil liberties following elections are often hot topics. Politicians in these countries must take into account the impact of intracultural reforms if they are to create a more stable political atmosphere. After the general election, an objective and holistic strategy is needed to face the complex and dynamic political reality in the Middle East.